Home › Compare › ETL Testing Tools › dbt vs Datafold

dbt vs Datafold

Checked Nov 15, 2026How we score

Verdict: dbt scores 8.9/10 against 8.3/10 for Datafold on our data score for ETL testing tools.

dbt has a free plan; Datafold does not.

dbt leads on 2 checks and Datafold on 0; 4 are even, out of 6 checks (yes/no, price and seats) where we have data for both.

Choose dbt for analytics engineers testing transformations inside the warehouse. Choose Datafold for analytics engineering teams using dbt and teams validating warehouse migrations.

Scoreboard: 6 checks

CheckdbtDatafold
Free planLeads
Free trialLeads
Smaller seat minimumEvenEven
CI/CD integrationEvenEven
Scheduled test runsEvenEven
Snowflake, Databricks and BigQuery supportEvenEven
Total20

At a glance

dbtDatafold
Score8.9/10 (#2)8.3/10 (#4)
Best forAnalytics engineers testing transformations inside the warehouseAnalytics engineering teams using dbt and teams validating warehouse migrations
Free planYesNo
Paid from (annual)See vendorSee vendor
Paid from (monthly)$100/user/mo—
Free trialStarter plan free trial (length not stated)—
Minimum seats11
PlatformsCloud (SaaS), Self-hosted (open-source runtime)Cloud (SaaS, multi-tenant), Dedicated single-tenant cloud, Customer-hosted in AWS, GCP or Azure (operated by Datafold)

Features

ToolScoreNo-code test creationSource-to-target comparisonCI/CD integrationScheduled test runsSnowflake, Databricks and BigQuery support
dbt8.9/10Not confirmedNot confirmedYesYesYes
Datafold8.3/10YesYesYesYesYes

Pros and cons

dbt

Pros
  • Free Developer plan (1 seat) and an Apache 2.0 open-source runtime
  • Four generic data tests built in; any SQL query that returns failing rows can become a test
  • Job scheduling and CI checks on GitHub and GitLab included from the free plan
  • Adapters for Snowflake, Databricks and BigQuery among others
Cons
  • Tests run inside one warehouse; comparing a separate source system with a target is not built in
  • Tests are written in SQL and YAML rather than built in a no-code interface
  • Starter costs $100 per user per month and is limited to 1 project; SSO needs Enterprise
dbt pricing →

Datafold

Pros
  • Value-level, row-and-column diffs across databases, including Snowflake, Databricks, BigQuery, Redshift, Oracle, SQL Server and Teradata
  • File diffing for CSV/TSV, Excel and Parquet files in S3, ADLS or GCS, including file-to-table comparisons
  • CI integration runs diffs on each pull request with dbt, Airflow or any git repository
  • SOC 2, HIPAA and GDPR compliance; SSO via SAML, Okta and Google
Cons
  • No public pricing; the pricing URL redirects to a contact form and multi-tenant sign-up is by invitation
  • In the current version, data diff monitors do not send notifications yet (Slack, Teams and PagerDuty alerts are documented for Datafold Classic)
  • File diffing does not list JSON or XML files
Datafold pricing →

Frequently asked questions

How do dbt and Datafold compare on features and price?

dbt leads on 2 checks and Datafold on 0; 4 are even, out of 6 checks (yes/no, price and seats) where we have data for both.

Is dbt better than Datafold?

dbt scores 8.9/10 against 8.3/10 for Datafold on our data score for ETL testing tools. dbt is best for analytics engineers testing transformations inside the warehouse; Datafold is best for analytics engineering teams using dbt and teams validating warehouse migrations.

Which is cheaper, dbt or Datafold?

Check each vendor's pricing page; one of them does not publish an entry price.

Do dbt and Datafold have free plans?

dbt: yes. Datafold: no.

See the full ETL Testing Tools ranking for other options.

Sources