Home › Compare › Data Quality Tools › Deequ vs Great Expectations (GX Core)

Deequ vs Great Expectations (GX Core)

Checked Nov 15, 2026How we score

Verdict: Deequ scores 8.4/10 against 7.9/10 for Great Expectations (GX Core) on our data score for data quality tools.

Both have a free plan.

Deequ and Great Expectations (GX Core) lead on 0 checks each; 5 are even, out of 5 checks (yes/no, price and seats) where we have data for both.

Choose Deequ for spark and Scala/Python engineers validating large datasets in batch pipelines. Choose Great Expectations (GX Core) for python data engineers who want code-defined data tests in pipelines at no license cost.

Scoreboard: 5 checks

CheckDeequGreat Expectations (GX Core)
Free planEvenEven
Free trialEvenEven
Smaller seat minimumEvenEven
Custom rule checksEvenEven
Open sourceEvenEven
Total00

At a glance

DeequGreat Expectations (GX Core)
Score8.4/10 (#3)7.9/10 (#6)
Best forSpark and Scala/Python engineers validating large datasets in batch pipelinesPython data engineers who want code-defined data tests in pipelines at no license cost
Free planYesYes
Paid from (annual)See vendorSee vendor
Paid from (monthly)——
Free trial——
Minimum seats11
PlatformsSelf-hosted (Apache Spark library)Self-hosted (Python library), Python library (self-hosted), Cloud (SaaS)

Features

ToolScoreData profilingCustom rule checksML anomaly detectionData cleansing / correctionOpen source
Deequ8.4/10YesYesNot confirmedNot confirmedYes
Great Expectations (GX Core)7.9/10Not confirmedYesNot confirmedNot confirmedYes

Pros and cons

Deequ

Pros
  • Free and open source (Apache-2.0)
  • Scales with Apache Spark for very large datasets
  • Automatic constraint suggestion and column profiling
  • Supports AWS Data Quality Definition Language (DQDL) rules
Cons
  • Library only: no UI, scheduling or alerting built in
  • Requires Spark; releases are tied to specific Spark versions
  • Recent versions (2.1.0+) require Java 11
Deequ pricing →

Great Expectations (GX Core)

Pros
  • Free and open source (Apache-2.0), about 11.9k GitHub stars
  • Large library of built-in Expectations, extensible with custom ones
  • Checkpoint actions can notify Slack, Microsoft Teams, email, PagerDuty, Opsgenie or an API endpoint
  • Actively released: version 1.25.0 published on PyPI on 2026-11-12
Cons
  • GX Cloud (the hosted UI) is no longer publicly available, so there is no vendor-hosted option
  • Code-first; requires Python skills to set up and maintain
  • No built-in ML anomaly detection or data cleansing stated
  • Long-term roadmap under Fivetran stewardship not yet detailed
Great Expectations (GX Core) pricing →

Frequently asked questions

How do Deequ and Great Expectations (GX Core) compare on features and price?

Deequ and Great Expectations (GX Core) lead on 0 checks each; 5 are even, out of 5 checks (yes/no, price and seats) where we have data for both.

Is Deequ better than Great Expectations (GX Core)?

Deequ scores 8.4/10 against 7.9/10 for Great Expectations (GX Core) on our data score for data quality tools. Deequ is best for spark and Scala/Python engineers validating large datasets in batch pipelines; Great Expectations (GX Core) is best for python data engineers who want code-defined data tests in pipelines at no license cost.

Which is cheaper, Deequ or Great Expectations (GX Core)?

Check each vendor's pricing page; one of them does not publish an entry price.

Do Deequ and Great Expectations (GX Core) have free plans?

Deequ: yes. Great Expectations (GX Core): yes.

See the full Data Quality Tools ranking for other options.

Sources