Home › Compare › Data Quality Tools › Elementary vs Great Expectations (GX Core)

Elementary vs Great Expectations (GX Core)

Checked Nov 15, 2026How we score

Verdict: Elementary scores 8.4/10 against 7.9/10 for Great Expectations (GX Core) on our data score for data quality tools.

Both have a free plan.

Elementary leads on 1 check and Great Expectations (GX Core) on 0; 4 are even, out of 5 checks (yes/no, price and seats) where we have data for both.

Choose Elementary for analytics engineering teams that build with dbt. Choose Great Expectations (GX Core) for python data engineers who want code-defined data tests in pipelines at no license cost.

Scoreboard: 5 checks

CheckElementaryGreat Expectations (GX Core)
Free planEvenEven
Free trialLeads
Smaller seat minimumEvenEven
Custom rule checksEvenEven
Open sourceEvenEven
Total10

At a glance

ElementaryGreat Expectations (GX Core)
Score8.4/10 (#4)7.9/10 (#6)
Best forAnalytics engineering teams that build with dbtPython data engineers who want code-defined data tests in pipelines at no license cost
Free planYesYes
Paid from (annual)See vendorSee vendor
Paid from (monthly)——
Free trial30-day free trial of Elementary Cloud—
Minimum seats11
PlatformsCloud (SaaS), Self-hosted (OSS)Self-hosted (Python library), Python library (self-hosted), Cloud (SaaS)

Features

ToolScoreData profilingCustom rule checksML anomaly detectionData cleansing / correctionOpen source
Elementary8.4/10Not confirmedYesYesNot confirmedYes
Great Expectations (GX Core)7.9/10Not confirmedYesNot confirmedNot confirmedYes

Pros and cons

Elementary

Pros
  • Open-source dbt package and CLI (Apache-2.0) can be self-hosted at no cost
  • Tests are configured in the dbt project as code, alongside existing dbt tests
  • 30-day cloud trial with no limits on seats, environments or monitored tables
  • Elementary states it is SOC 2 Type II certified and the cloud reads metadata only
Cons
  • Mainly useful for teams already using dbt
  • Cloud prices are not published ('Talk to sales')
  • Pricing page has inconsistencies (trial references an 'Essentials' plan that is not listed)
  • AI agents are billed separately with credits
Elementary pricing →

Great Expectations (GX Core)

Pros
  • Free and open source (Apache-2.0), about 11.9k GitHub stars
  • Large library of built-in Expectations, extensible with custom ones
  • Checkpoint actions can notify Slack, Microsoft Teams, email, PagerDuty, Opsgenie or an API endpoint
  • Actively released: version 1.25.0 published on PyPI on 2026-11-12
Cons
  • GX Cloud (the hosted UI) is no longer publicly available, so there is no vendor-hosted option
  • Code-first; requires Python skills to set up and maintain
  • No built-in ML anomaly detection or data cleansing stated
  • Long-term roadmap under Fivetran stewardship not yet detailed
Great Expectations (GX Core) pricing →

Frequently asked questions

How do Elementary and Great Expectations (GX Core) compare on features and price?

Elementary leads on 1 check and Great Expectations (GX Core) on 0; 4 are even, out of 5 checks (yes/no, price and seats) where we have data for both.

Is Elementary better than Great Expectations (GX Core)?

Elementary scores 8.4/10 against 7.9/10 for Great Expectations (GX Core) on our data score for data quality tools. Elementary is best for analytics engineering teams that build with dbt; Great Expectations (GX Core) is best for python data engineers who want code-defined data tests in pipelines at no license cost.

Which is cheaper, Elementary or Great Expectations (GX Core)?

Check each vendor's pricing page; one of them does not publish an entry price.

Do Elementary and Great Expectations (GX Core) have free plans?

Elementary: yes. Great Expectations (GX Core): yes.

See the full Data Quality Tools ranking for other options.

Sources