Great Expectations (GX Core) vs QuerySurge
Verdict: Great Expectations (GX Core) scores 8.8/10 against 8.8/10 for QuerySurge on our data score for file testing tools.
Great Expectations (GX Core) has a free plan; QuerySurge does not.
Great Expectations (GX Core) leads on 2 checks and QuerySurge on 1; 3 are even, out of 6 checks (yes/no, price and seats) where we have data for both.
Choose Great Expectations (GX Core) for python data engineers who want code-defined data tests in pipelines at no license cost. Choose QuerySurge for enterprise QA and data teams testing data warehouses, migrations and BI reports.
Scoreboard: 6 checks
| Check | Great Expectations (GX Core) | QuerySurge |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Leads | |
| Free trial | Leads | |
| Smaller seat minimum | Leads | |
| CSV, JSON and XML files | Even | Even |
| Excel files | Even | Even |
| Parquet or Avro files | Even | Even |
| Total | 2 | 1 |
At a glance
| Great Expectations (GX Core) | QuerySurge | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 8.8/10 (#2) | 8.8/10 (#3) |
| Best for | Python data engineers who want code-defined data tests in pipelines at no license cost | Enterprise QA and data teams testing data warehouses, migrations and BI reports |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Paid from (annual) | See vendor | $500.50/user/mo |
| Paid from (monthly) | — | — |
| Free trial | — | 1-day hosted cloud trial (1 user), 15-day download trial (2 users), 45-day proof of concept |
| Minimum seats | 1 | 2 |
| Platforms | Self-hosted (Python library), Python library (self-hosted), Cloud (SaaS) | On-premises, Private cloud (Azure, AWS, GCP and others), Azure and AWS marketplace (pay-as-you-go), Private cloud, Azure (pay-as-you-go), AWS (pay-as-you-go), Public cloud, AWS and Azure pay-as-you-go |
Features
| Tool | Score | CSV, JSON and XML files | Excel files | Parquet or Avro files | File-to-database comparison | Schema / format validation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Great Expectations (GX Core) | 8.8/10 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Not confirmed | Yes |
| QuerySurge | 8.8/10 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Not confirmed |
- Only Great Expectations (GX Core) confirms: Schema / format validation.
- Only QuerySurge confirms: File-to-database comparison.
Pros and cons
Great Expectations (GX Core)
Pros- Free and open source (Apache-2.0), about 11.9k GitHub stars
- Large library of built-in Expectations, extensible with custom ones
- Checkpoint actions can notify Slack, Microsoft Teams, email, PagerDuty, Opsgenie or an API endpoint
- Actively released: version 1.25.0 published on PyPI on 2026-11-12
- GX Cloud (the hosted UI) is no longer publicly available, so there is no vendor-hosted option
- Code-first; requires Python skills to set up and maintain
- No built-in ML anomaly detection or data cleansing stated
- Long-term roadmap under Fivetran stewardship not yet detailed
QuerySurge
Pros- List prices are published on the vendor's site, including per-user and 5/10/25-user package prices
- Connects to 200+ data stores, including Snowflake, Databricks, BigQuery, Excel, Parquet, JSON and XML files
- BI Tester validates Power BI, Tableau, IBM Cognos, Strategy, Oracle BI and SAP BusinessObjects reports against source data
- Several trial options: 1-day hosted cloud trial, 15-day download trial and 45-day proof of concept
- Subscription per-user pricing starts at $6,006 per full user per year with a 2-user minimum
- BI Tester, Full API and Query Import/Export are paid add-ons on the smaller packages
- Customer-installed software (on-premises, private cloud, or pay-as-you-go Azure/AWS marketplace image) rather than a vendor-run SaaS
Frequently asked questions
How do Great Expectations (GX Core) and QuerySurge compare on features and price?
Great Expectations (GX Core) leads on 2 checks and QuerySurge on 1; 3 are even, out of 6 checks (yes/no, price and seats) where we have data for both.
Is Great Expectations (GX Core) better than QuerySurge?
Great Expectations (GX Core) scores 8.8/10 against 8.8/10 for QuerySurge on our data score for file testing tools. Great Expectations (GX Core) is best for python data engineers who want code-defined data tests in pipelines at no license cost; QuerySurge is best for enterprise QA and data teams testing data warehouses, migrations and BI reports.
Which is cheaper, Great Expectations (GX Core) or QuerySurge?
Check each vendor's pricing page; one of them does not publish an entry price.
Do Great Expectations (GX Core) and QuerySurge have free plans?
Great Expectations (GX Core): yes. QuerySurge: no.
See the full File Testing Tools ranking for other options.
Sources
- Great Expectations (GX Core): official pricing page · GX Core GitHub repository (fivetran/great_expectations) · Great Expectations blog: An update from Great Expectations · Fivetran press release on GX Core stewardship · GX Core checkpoint actions source · PyPI great-expectations · GX Cloud pricing page · GX docs: Connect to filesystem data · GX API reference: PandasFilesystemDatasource · GX docs: Schema data quality use case · great_expectations GitHub repository
- QuerySurge: official pricing page · QuerySurge licensing & pricing · QuerySurge feature list · QuerySurge integrations · QuerySurge BI Tester · QuerySurge trial options · About RTTS · QuerySurge Power BI integration page · QuerySurge DevOps for Data page · QuerySurge FAQ