Home › Compare › Power BI Report Testing Tools › SemanticOps vs Fab Inspector (formerly PBI Inspector)

SemanticOps vs Fab Inspector (formerly PBI Inspector)

Checked Nov 15, 2026How we score

Verdict: SemanticOps scores 9.4/10 against 7.9/10 for Fab Inspector (formerly PBI Inspector) on our data score for power BI report testing tools.

Both have a free plan.

SemanticOps and Fab Inspector (formerly PBI Inspector) lead on 0 checks each; 5 are even, out of 5 checks (yes/no, price and seats) where we have data for both.

Choose SemanticOps for power BI developers who edit semantic models with AI assistants and want regression tests. Choose Fab Inspector (formerly PBI Inspector) for power BI developers enforcing report standards in Azure DevOps or GitHub pipelines.

Scoreboard: 5 checks

CheckSemanticOpsFab Inspector (formerly PBI Inspector)
Free planEvenEven
Free trialEvenEven
Smaller seat minimumEvenEven
Power BIEvenEven
CI/CD integrationEvenEven
Total00

At a glance

SemanticOpsFab Inspector (formerly PBI Inspector)
Score9.4/10 (#2)7.9/10 (#5)
Best forPower BI developers who edit semantic models with AI assistants and want regression testsPower BI developers enforcing report standards in Azure DevOps or GitHub pipelines
Free planYesYes
Paid from (annual)$29.08/moSee vendor
Paid from (monthly)$39/mo—
Free trial——
Minimum seats11
PlatformsWindows, macOSWindows, macOS, Docker

Features

ToolScorePower BIReport data validated against sourceReport regression testingReport performance testingCI/CD integration
SemanticOps9.4/10YesNot confirmedYesYesYes
Fab Inspector (formerly PBI Inspector)7.9/10YesNot confirmedNot confirmedNot confirmedYes

Pros and cons

SemanticOps

Pros
  • Low published price: Pro is $39/month or $349/year, with a free tier
  • Test Runner includes regression snapshots, query duration budgets and row-level and object-level security tests
  • Exports JUnit XML, Markdown, HTML and JSON so CI pipelines can fail builds on regressions
  • Runs locally with no telemetry, per the vendor
Cons
  • Tests semantic models against expected values, not against the source database
  • Does not run CI itself; execution must be wired into an existing pipeline
  • Built by an independent developer; Teams pricing is quote-only
SemanticOps pricing →

Fab Inspector (formerly PBI Inspector)

Pros
  • Free and open source (MIT license)
  • Outputs Azure DevOps task commands or GitHub Actions annotations for pipeline gating
  • Rules can include DAX query and T-SQL query conditions, not only layout checks
  • Runs against local item folders or published Fabric workspaces
Cons
  • Community project, not supported by Microsoft
  • Does not read PBIX files; reports must be saved as PBIP / PBIR folders
  • Rules are written as JSON, which takes time to learn; base rules focus on report visual quality
Fab Inspector (formerly PBI Inspector) pricing →

Frequently asked questions

How do SemanticOps and Fab Inspector (formerly PBI Inspector) compare on features and price?

SemanticOps and Fab Inspector (formerly PBI Inspector) lead on 0 checks each; 5 are even, out of 5 checks (yes/no, price and seats) where we have data for both.

Is SemanticOps better than Fab Inspector (formerly PBI Inspector)?

SemanticOps scores 9.4/10 against 7.9/10 for Fab Inspector (formerly PBI Inspector) on our data score for power BI report testing tools. SemanticOps is best for power BI developers who edit semantic models with AI assistants and want regression tests; Fab Inspector (formerly PBI Inspector) is best for power BI developers enforcing report standards in Azure DevOps or GitHub pipelines.

Which is cheaper, SemanticOps or Fab Inspector (formerly PBI Inspector)?

Check each vendor's pricing page; one of them does not publish an entry price.

Do SemanticOps and Fab Inspector (formerly PBI Inspector) have free plans?

SemanticOps: yes. Fab Inspector (formerly PBI Inspector): yes.

See the full Power BI Report Testing Tools ranking for other options.

Sources