Home › Compare › Data Monitoring Testing Tools › Soda vs Anomalo

Soda vs Anomalo

Checked Nov 15, 2026How we score

Verdict: Soda scores 9.6/10 against 8.3/10 for Anomalo on our data score for data monitoring testing tools.

Soda has a free plan; Anomalo does not.

Soda leads on 1 check and Anomalo on 0; 7 are even, out of 8 checks (yes/no, price and seats) where we have data for both.

Choose Soda for data engineering teams that want data contracts and pipeline tests with a free tier and published team price. Choose Anomalo for enterprises that want unsupervised anomaly detection without writing many rules, including in their own VPC.

Scoreboard: 8 checks

CheckSodaAnomalo
Free planLeads
Free trialEvenEven
Smaller seat minimumEvenEven
ML anomaly detectionEvenEven
Freshness and volume checksEvenEven
Alerts (email, Slack or Teams)EvenEven
Data lineageEvenEven
Custom rule checksEvenEven
Total10

At a glance

SodaAnomalo
Score9.6/10 (#2)8.3/10 (#6)
Best forData engineering teams that want data contracts and pipeline tests with a free tier and published team priceEnterprises that want unsupervised anomaly detection without writing many rules, including in their own VPC
Free planYesNo
Paid from (annual)See vendorSee vendor
Paid from (monthly)$750/mo—
Free trial——
Minimum seats11
PlatformsCloud (SaaS), Self-hosted runner (Kubernetes), Python library, Private deployment (Team plan), Python library (Soda Core)Cloud (SaaS), Customer VPC

Features

ToolScoreML anomaly detectionFreshness and volume checksAlerts (email, Slack or Teams)Data lineageCustom rule checks
Soda9.6/10YesYesYesYesYes
Anomalo8.3/10YesYesYesYesYes

Pros and cons

Soda

Pros
  • Published pricing: Free at $0 and Team at $750 per month
  • Free plan includes unlimited users and alerting and ticketing integrations, no credit card needed
  • Alerts to Slack and Microsoft Teams; custom SQL metric monitors supported
  • Deployment options: Python libraries in pipelines, Soda-hosted runner, or self-hosted runner
Cons
  • Soda Core v4 is under the Elastic License 2.0, not an OSI open-source license
  • SSO, RBAC, audit logs and the no-code interface require the Team plan
  • Usage beyond the free Soda Processing Units (SPUs) is billed pay-as-you-go
Soda pricing →

Anomalo

Pros
  • Can run fully in the customer's VPC or as SaaS
  • Data quality rules can be written in natural language ('No SQL required')
  • Covers unstructured document quality as well as tables
  • States SOC 2 Type II, GDPR and HIPAA compliance plus SAML SSO
Cons
  • No public pricing page; demo request only
  • Alert channels named on the site are Slack and email only; Teams and PagerDuty not stated
  • Several agents (First Responder, Business KPI Monitoring) are marked 'coming soon'
Anomalo pricing →

Frequently asked questions

How do Soda and Anomalo compare on features and price?

Soda leads on 1 check and Anomalo on 0; 7 are even, out of 8 checks (yes/no, price and seats) where we have data for both.

Is Soda better than Anomalo?

Soda scores 9.6/10 against 8.3/10 for Anomalo on our data score for data monitoring testing tools. Soda is best for data engineering teams that want data contracts and pipeline tests with a free tier and published team price; Anomalo is best for enterprises that want unsupervised anomaly detection without writing many rules, including in their own VPC.

Which is cheaper, Soda or Anomalo?

Check each vendor's pricing page; one of them does not publish an entry price.

Do Soda and Anomalo have free plans?

Soda: yes. Anomalo: no.

See the full Data Monitoring Testing Tools ranking for other options.

Sources